In under 60 seconds, he highlighted her inconsistent stances on key issues like criminal justice—where she portrayed herself as both tough on crime and a reformer, depending on political convenience.
But Ramaswamy didn’t stop there. He pointed out how Harris attacked Joe Biden in the 2020 debates, questioning his record on busing and race, only to eagerly accept his VP offer, demonstrating blatant political opportunism.
Further, Ramaswamy exposed Harris’s shaky prosecutorial record during her tenure as California’s attorney general, particularly on marijuana decriminalization.
She opposed legalization when it could have made a difference, only to change her tune when public opinion shifted.
But this isn’t just about criminal justice. Harris also flip-flopped on Medicare-for-All, first supporting it during her presidential campaign, then backing off when the political pressure mounted.
Similarly, she was inconsistent on the death penalty, supporting it earlier in her career before later opposing it.
This wasn’t just a sharp critique—it was a full dismantling of Harris’s political persona.
Ramaswamy effectively illustrated that Harris lacks firm convictions, instead changing her positions to align with what’s politically expedient.
Ramaswamy’s takedown is a reminder that politicians should be held accountable for their contradictions.
Don’t let the media sweep these facts under the rug.